Connect with us

Nation

Alec Baldwin Lowest of the Low; Blames Victim For Shooting ‘Everything is at her Direction’

Published

on

“Just when you think Alec Baldwin can’t go any lower, he blames Halyna Hutchins, the woman he shot to death, for getting shot to death” writes the New York Post. Naturally, Baldwin gifted his first interview since the tragic death of Hutchins to his Hampton’s buddy and leftwing media host George Stephanopoulos.

“Everything is at her direction,” Baldwin told George Stephanopoulos during the hourlong interview that aired Thursday night on ABC. Ultimately the entire one hour can be summed up by Baldwin’s twelve words: “Someone is responsible for what happened, and I know it’s not me.”

For any viewers looking for anything particularly meaningful from Baldwin or for him to answer tough questions, a sit-down with his liberal elite buddy was not the place to get it. “I’m holding the gun where she told me to hold it,” Baldwin said, “which ended up right below her armpit. Which is what I was told — I don’t know.”

He carried on, “I would never point a gun at anyone, and pull the trigger at them. Never.” Oddly he had just finished describing how he was pointing the gun at Hutchins.
Agent Bobby Chacon, a retired FBI agent who works as a writer and on-set consultant for Hollywood stated “The bullet striking and killing that woman came out of the barrel of the gun pointed directly at her…Bullets don’t curve. He isn’t in ‘The Matrix.’ The trigger would still have to be pulled.”

The New York Post reports:

“I’m not aware of any gun firing itself,” says Steve Wolf, a Hollywood firearms and special-effects expert since 1994. “I’ve never seen a gun self-discharge. A single-action revolver like this” — the Colt that Baldwin fired — “can be discharged very easily, with minimal input required … The trigger still must have been pressed.”
Wolf is also outraged by a larger concern. “It’s really important to discredit anyone who claims that guns fire themselves,” he says. “If this becomes an acceptable defense, there goes any accountability when it comes to shooting people. We can’t have this kind of ‘guns shoot themselves’ thing. They don’t.”

Continue Reading
5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. ScienceABC123

    December 4, 2021 at 12:26 pm

    The standard leftist statement when it comes to responsibility – “It’s not my fault! It’s someone else’s fault!”

  2. ConAlpizar

    December 4, 2021 at 9:03 pm

    Just because the Bipolar is also a Psicopath, does not gives you the right to whisper anything bad about the Demented human hater Baldwin!

  3. John Connors

    December 5, 2021 at 11:19 am

    this person is a low life movie actor. They are all low and all worried how they look in the public. They wear foolish clothing and how. much attention they are getting and how much foolish attention they are getting. His statment and false crying is all for his up and coming trial so the stupid public will say oh poor Baldwin.. Why has he not been arrested??? This a script his lawyers have prepared to draw simpathy from the stupid public.

  4. Robert

    December 5, 2021 at 12:24 pm

    I think that finding out how a live round got into the gun is paramount and if someone is found to have put it in the gun should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. That aside my next issue is, this is not the first time this has happened in movie productions. So like flying, the pilot is responsible for checking the plane before they fly and is responsible if anything happens that they should have checked for (like is the fuel topped up). Any actor that is going to use a gun should have to take extensive training on using firearms. I mean how much effort and time would it have taken Alex to check to a) see if the gun was loaded and if so empty it if not needed and b) If it needs to be loaded for a scene, insure the rounds are blanks and not live rounds. It would have taken Alex all of 1 min to do this and a life would be saved. So, sorry Alex, even if you didn’t pull the trigger (something that I find is a fabrication) you were responsible to check a dangerous prop before using it!

  5. Red Patriot

    December 9, 2021 at 10:26 pm

    When your brother says you need to be prosecuted, it is a good sign that you should be prosecuted. He is the epitome of a scum bag.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Elections

BREAKING: Trump ordered to pay over $350M, barred from operating his business in NY in civil fraud case ruling

Published

on

Former President Donald Trump and his business empire faced a significant setback as a New York judge ruled against them in a civil fraud case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. The 92-page ruling, handed down by Judge Arthur Engoron, barred Trump from operating his business in New York for three years and imposed over $350 million in damages.

The case, which unfolded over months of trial proceedings, stemmed from allegations that Trump inflated his assets and engaged in fraudulent practices. Engoron’s ruling cited a litany of charges, including persistent fraud, falsifying records, issuing false financial statements, and conspiracy to commit fraud.

Moreover, the judge imposed restrictions on key figures within the Trump Organization, including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, barring them from serving in certain corporate roles in New York for a specified period.

Engoron’s scathing assessment of Trump’s testimony during the trial further undermined the former president’s credibility. The judge criticized Trump for evasive responses and irrelevant digressions, highlighting the detrimental effect on his credibility.

In response to the ruling, Trump’s attorney, Christopher Kise, lambasted the court’s decision, alleging political bias and a disregard for established legal principles. Kise argued that the evidence presented during the trial failed to support the allegations of fraud and emphasized Trump’s substantial net worth.

Kise’s assertions were echoed by Alina Habba, another attorney representing Trump, who denounced the verdict as a “manifest injustice” resulting from a politically motivated witch hunt.

Throughout the proceedings, Trump consistently dismissed the trial as politically motivated, accusing both Engoron and James of partisan bias. His legal team also criticized the absence of a jury in the trial, questioning the fairness of the proceedings.

Attorney General Letitia James, who spearheaded the lawsuit against Trump and his organization, portrayed the ruling as a victory for accountability and transparency in business practices. The lawsuit alleged fraudulent conduct and sought substantial financial penalties, a portion of which would contribute to the state treasury.

The fallout from the case extends beyond Trump and his business interests, with implications for the broader business community and the rule of law. The contentious nature of the trial and its outcome underscored deep divisions and raised questions about the integrity of the legal system.

Trump vows to appeal the decision.

Continue Reading

Trending