Connect with us


79% Of Truckers Don’t Want To Travel Through Areas That Defund Police. Neither Do I.



TruckDriverShutterstock 1712779543

I agree with the 79 percent of truckers that don’t want to travel through communities that defund police. Neither do I.

Imagine if you’re a truck driver and having to pull over at night to sleep. Can you imagine how frightening it would be if you couldn’t call for help if something went wrong. Or for that matter, what would happen to you if you tried to defend your self against criminals and in the end were blamed for taking matters into your own hands. It could land you in jail.

It’s a recipe for disaster.

Defunding police is just plain stupid. A civil society needs to be able to protect itself from criminal elements and citizens, particularly the most vulnerable, must be able to rely on their community being protected.

Can you imagine a world in chaos? Wait, yes, I can imagine it and I’ve seen it.

First and foremost, in the war zones I’ve traveled to throughout my career, where the most vulnerable women and children had no one to turn to for help. Secondly, I see it in the craziness of Seattle’s CHAZ (Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone) where mainly over-privileged American kids, who sleep in their parents’ basements, are angry about their privilege.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


NY Lawmakers want to tax tech giants to get $500M to fund unemployment benefits for illegal migrants



new york city

New York lawmakers are debating over a proposed Democratic initiative that would pave the way for a multibillion-dollar fund designed to provide unemployment benefits for illegal immigrants. Spearheaded by state Senator Jessica Ramos, a Queens Democrat, the proposal has ignited passionate discussions within the Senate Finance Committee, where it currently awaits further deliberation.

The Center Square reports the proposal would utilize a $500 million trust fund earmarked specifically to offer jobless benefits for individuals who find themselves ineligible for traditional unemployment payments and other public assistance programs. To finance this ambitious endeavor, proponents of the plan are advocating for the imposition of a novel tax targeting tech behemoths like Google and Amazon. This tax, aimed at digital advertising revenue, is projected to generate hundreds of millions of dollars to sustain the fund.

Ramos has alluded to her belief that migrants are a fundamental contribution to the state’s economy. Despite their authorization to work, payment of taxes, and active involvement in the labor force, undocumented immigrants face a glaring disparity—they are excluded from accessing vital safety nets like unemployment benefits if they lose their jobs.

In a social media post, Ramos cited the expiration of federal unemployment insurance for freelancers and the depletion of the Excluded Workers Fund. She argues vehemently for a safety net aligned with the evolving dynamics of the labor market, one that extends support to all workers, regardless of their immigration status.

The proposed fund, aptly named the Unemployment Bridge Program, outlines comprehensive eligibility criteria encompassing a spectrum of marginalized workers—from undocumented migrants to freelancers and individuals recently released from incarceration or immigrant detention. By establishing clear guidelines and procedures, the program endeavors to streamline the application process, ensuring equitable access to unemployment benefits for those in need.

The initiative comes in the wake of prolonged deliberations regarding jobless benefits for undocumented immigrants and nontraditional workers in New York. Amid the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, the state previously allocated $2.1 billion to the Excluded Workers Fund, offering a lifeline to those excluded from conventional unemployment benefits.

Gov. Kathy Hochul’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2025 underscores a commitment to supporting asylum seekers, with significant allocations directed towards housing and legal assistance. The proposal has met with opposition from Republicans, who argue for prioritizing legal residents and taxpayers in the allocation of state resources. Senate Minority Leader Rob Ortt contends that limited resources should be reserved exclusively for those who have contributed to the state’s tax base.

Continue Reading